Jim Cooper in
chapter eight “Helping” of “Down on the Island”, describes the difference
between two concepts copying and cheating. Cooper exposes the fine line between
helping and doing the work of another person. He contrasts the American culture
with Puerto Rican culture with precision and excellent examples using the
educational model of competition versus cooperation. The author also exposes how
the problem of cheating has personal basis in Puerto Rico that begins in
school, family and friends since childhood. For example, the author exposes
that starting in first grade teachers encourages their students to receive help
from their classmates.
As I mentioned in
the previous post, the readings of “The Roots of
Caribbean Identity: Language, Race and Ecology” by Peter Roberts and
“Down on the Island” by Jim Cooper are directly linked, however, this time both
authors agree about how the culture can represent the identity of a country or
an individual. For example, Cooper contrasts the cooperative and non-competitive
culture of Puerto Rican families and schools with the competitive attitude of
American families and schools. Base on my own experience, I am midway between
cooperative and the competitive models, because I think you can help your
friends but you cannot do their work. I have never copied on a test because I
think that a behavior of that magnitude could be very stressful and it goes
against my ethical values as a student. Cooper describes how the hospitable
culture of Puerto Ricans is related to the concept of earning a grade versus
giving a grade. I agree with Cooper in that sometimes students think that because
they establish a friendly relationship with the professor, the professor is
obligated to give him a good grade. Most people always resolve everything with
Cooper phrase: "Don’t like him or her?", but the point is that giving
a grade is not related with personal relationships. People should learn that
grades and most things in the life are not personal. You should be “buena
gente”, i.e. good people, but you always should do your own work or accept your
responsibilities.
I
think that the traditional communication model would be a good connection with
this Cooper’s chapter, because I perceived that Cooper had problems when he was
trying to give the message about the difference of helping and cheating to his
students. He discovered that the real problem was in trying to explain to his
students that helping their friends is a good thing but they should not help
them on a test. I also perceived in Cooper’s reading that the people he
intended to explain why he gave the grade of D or F to the student don’t
understand him or not perceived his meaning.
I agree with you, because i explain the same about our cultural background and how that can define us. Good reflection.
ReplyDeleteExcellent comments and connections. I appreciate how you applied the communication model to Cooper and the incidents that he describes.
ReplyDelete(E - Wo/S constr.)
Solid and strong positions on the topics. I love the blog theme.
You did a really great job in this reflection of Jim Cooper. I also like how you connect the communication model with Cooper situations giving some strong examples.
ReplyDeleteVery good reflection!. I liked the way you connect this theme with Peter Roberts's work and the traditional communication model.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteExcellent way of connecting the communication model with Jim Cooper's essay!
ReplyDelete